What Is RICO Law? A Detailed Guide

Understanding RICO: A Federal Law That Goes Beyond Traditional Crime

What is RICO law? RICO, the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, is a federal law enacted in 1970 that targets organized criminal activity by allowing prosecutors to charge individuals or groups who engage in an ongoing pattern of illegal conduct through an enterprise. The law creates both criminal and civil liability for racketeering activities.

Key Components of RICO:

• Enterprise – Any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or group of individuals associated in fact
• Predicate Acts – At least two qualifying crimes (from a list of over 35 federal and state offenses) committed within a 10-year period
• Pattern of Racketeering Activity – The predicate acts must be related and demonstrate continuity or threat of continued criminal activity
• Criminal Penalties – Up to 20 years in prison per count, fines up to $250,000 for individuals ($500,000 for organizations), and asset forfeiture
• Civil Remedies – Private parties can sue for treble damages (triple the actual damages) plus attorney’s fees

While RICO was originally designed to combat Mafia syndicates, federal prosecutors in Houston and across Texas now use it to target a wide range of criminal enterprises—from drug trafficking organizations and street gangs to corrupt business operations and white-collar fraud schemes. The law’s broad reach makes it one of the most powerful prosecutorial tools in the federal criminal justice system, but also one of the most complex to defend against.

RICO in Texas

RICO cases in the Southern District of Texas often involve multi-defendant conspiracies where the government alleges a pattern of criminal activity spanning years. The stakes are extraordinarily high: a RICO conviction can mean decades in federal prison, the loss of business assets, and lifelong consequences that extend far beyond the courtroom.

At The Martinez Law Firm, founder Herman Martinez draws on decades of experience—including service as a Chief Prosecutor for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office—to show why understanding what RICO law is is critical to building an effective defense in complex federal cases. His work on both sides of the courtroom, as well as his time as a City of Houston Judge, provides unique insight into how prosecutors construct RICO charges and how those theories can be strategically challenged.

The Origins and Evolution of the RICO Act

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, didn’t just appear out of thin air. It was born from a specific need and has since grown far beyond its original scope.

RICO was enacted on October 15, 1970, as Title IX of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970. Its primary purpose was clear: to strengthen legal tools for evidence gathering, establish new penal prohibitions, and provide improved sanctions and remedies for dealing with the unlawful activities of organized crime. At the time, law enforcement faced immense challenges in prosecuting high-ranking Mafia members whose disconnected structures made direct conviction difficult. RICO was Congress’s answer to this problem, aiming to dismantle these criminal syndicates from the top down.

Initially, the mention of RICO immediately brought to mind notorious figures like the “five Mafia families” convicted in New York City in 1986. This was precisely what the law was designed for – targeting traditional organized crime. However, even at its inception, legal scholars like G. Robert Blakey, one of the law’s drafters, asserted that Congress never intended RICO to be exclusively for the Mafia. Instead, the goal was a uniform set of rules applicable to criminal enterprises regardless of their background or public image.

And evolve it did.

What RICO Covers

Over the decades, the application of RICO dramatically expanded. Prosecutors recognized its immense power to target any ongoing criminal enterprise, not just the stereotypical mob. This led to its use against a wide range of actors, including:

• White-collar criminals: Cases involving large-scale fraud, securities violations, and money laundering. A notable early example was the prosecution of Wall Street executive Michael Milken.
• Corrupt public officials: RICO became a formidable weapon against corruption in government, targeting officials who used their positions for personal gain through patterns of illicit activities.
• Nonprofits and protest movements: Controversially, RICO’s broad provisions have even been applied to groups like anti-abortion activists and environmental protest organizations, though judicial guardrails have often intervened to protect First Amendment rights.
• Street gangs and music labels: More recently, RICO has been used in cases against modern criminal organizations, such as the indictment of rapper Young Thug and his YSL Records label in Georgia, alleging it was a street gang involved in violent activity.
• Political figures: The law’s reach was highlighted in 2023 with the Georgia state RICO charges against former President Donald Trump and his allies.

This evolution showcases RICO’s adaptability and sheer prosecutorial might. It began as a tool to fight the Mafia and became a broad statute used to combat any organized group engaged in a pattern of profit-driven criminal activity, dramatically changing the landscape of federal criminal law.

What is RICO Law and How Does It Work?

What is RICO law at its core? It’s a federal statute, codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, that creates both criminal and civil liability for engaging in racketeering activities that are connected to an “enterprise.” Unlike many criminal laws that target individual acts, RICO focuses on the pattern of criminal behavior and the organization behind it.

For a prosecutor in the U.S. Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of Texas to prove a RICO violation, they must establish four key elements: (1) conduct (2) of an enterprise (3) through a pattern (4) of racketeering activity. This framework allows federal authorities to target entire criminal structures, rather than just individual offenders or isolated incidents.

The Three Core Elements of a RICO Violation

Let’s break down the essential components that make up a RICO charge:

Predicate Acts:

These are the specific, underlying criminal offenses that form the basis of a RICO charge. RICO doesn’t define “racketeering activity” itself but rather provides an extensive list of state and federal crimes that can serve as predicate acts. This list is incredibly broad and includes:

State felony crimes involving acts or threats of murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in controlled substances.

Over one hundred federal offenses, such as mail fraud, wire fraud, bribery, money laundering, counterfeiting, witness tampering, securities violations, and even human trafficking.

For a comprehensive list, you can refer to 18 U.S.C. § 1961.

Pattern of Racketeering Activity:

Simply committing a few predicate acts isn’t enough. The law requires a “pattern.” This means at least two predicate offenses must have been committed within a ten-year period. However, the Supreme Court, in H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., clarified that these acts must also be “related” and demonstrate “continuity” or the “threat of continuity.” This is often referred to as the “continuity plus relationship” test:

Relatedness:

The predicate acts must share similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise be interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and not be isolated events.

Continuity:

This can be shown by a closed period of repeated conduct over a substantial period of time, or by demonstrating that the past conduct projects into the future with a threat of repetition, indicating an ongoing association or a regular way of conducting criminal activity. It’s not just about two crimes; it’s about a persistent course of criminal conduct.

Enterprise:

This is perhaps one of the most expansive and crucial elements of RICO. An “enterprise” is broadly defined to include “any individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated in fact although not a legal entity.” This means an enterprise can be a legitimate business, a government agency, a labor union, or even an informal “association-in-fact” – a group of people working together for a common, albeit illegal, purpose. The enterprise must affect interstate or foreign commerce in some way, which is often a low bar to meet. Critically, the enterprise must have:

• A shared purpose.
• Relationships among its members.
• A duration sufficient to pursue its shared purpose.
• And, importantly, the enterprise must be distinct from the pattern of racketeering activity itself. You can’t just be a collection of crimes; there must be an organized structure that the crimes operate through.

Understanding RICO Conspiracy Charges

Beyond the substantive RICO offenses, there’s also the powerful RICO conspiracy provision, found at 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d). This provision makes it unlawful to conspire to commit any of the prohibited activities under RICO.

What makes RICO conspiracy particularly potent is its breadth compared to traditional conspiracy laws. As the Supreme Court clarified in Salinas v. United States, the sole requirement for a RICO conspiracy is an agreement between two or more individuals or entities to engage in conduct that would, if completed, constitute a substantive RICO offense. This means:

• No Overt Act Required: Unlike many other conspiracy statutes, a RICO conspiracy charge typically does not require proof of an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy. The agreement itself is the crime.
• Broader Liability: An individual can be liable for RICO conspiracy even if they didn’t personally commit or agree to commit two predicate acts. If you agree to facilitate the overall criminal scheme of the enterprise, knowing its general scope and that it extends beyond your individual role, you could be charged. You don’t even need to know all the co-conspirators or every detail of the scheme.

This broad reach means that if you’re involved in any way with an organization that’s conducting its affairs through a pattern of racketeering, even if your role seems minor, you could face serious conspiracy charges.

Penalties and Remedies: The Consequences of a RICO Conviction

Being charged under RICO is no laughing matter. Whether it’s a criminal prosecution brought by the federal government or a civil lawsuit initiated by a private party, the consequences are severe and far-reaching.

A RICO conviction can lead to staggering prison sentences, massive financial penalties, and the forfeiture of assets. For businesses and individuals in Houston, this could mean the complete dismantling of an organization, financial ruin, and a profound impact on one’s life and reputation.

Criminal Penalties for RICO Violations

The criminal penalties associated with RICO violations are designed to be punitive and to strip criminal enterprises of their ill-gotten gains. For those found guilty of racketeering, the stakes are incredibly high:

• Imprisonment: Individuals can face up to 20 years in federal prison per racketeering count. If any of the underlying predicate acts carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment (such as murder), the RICO sentence can also extend to life.
• Fines: Significant financial penalties are imposed. Individuals can be fined up to $250,000, while organizations can face fines of up to $500,000. These fines are in addition to the sentences for any underlying predicate acts a defendant is convicted of.
• Asset Forfeiture: This is one of RICO’s most powerful deterrents. Convicted defendants must forfeit any interest in the enterprise, any property derived from or used in the racketeering activity, and any proceeds obtained through their illegal conduct. This can include homes, cars, bank accounts, and entire businesses.
• Dissolution: In some cases, the government can seek injunctive relief, including the dissolution or reorganization of the criminal enterprise itself, effectively shutting down its operations.

These penalties, outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 1963, underscore the federal government’s commitment to eradicating organized criminal activity.

Civil RICO: Lawsuits and Treble Damages

Beyond criminal prosecution, RICO also provides a powerful tool for victims: the civil lawsuit. Any person “injured in his business or property” by a violation of RICO can bring a civil action in federal court. This private right of action offers victims a chance to recover damages and hold perpetrators accountable.

The most compelling aspect of civil RICO is the provision for treble damages. This means that if a plaintiff successfully proves they were harmed by a RICO violation, they can recover triple the amount of actual damages they sustained, plus the costs of the lawsuit and reasonable attorney’s fees. This makes civil RICO an attractive option for victims, particularly in complex business disputes or cases of widespread fraud.

While the burden of proof in a civil RICO case is lower than in a criminal case (requiring a “preponderance of the evidence” rather than “beyond a reasonable doubt”), it’s still a high bar to meet, requiring plaintiffs to establish all the complex elements of a RICO violation. However, if a criminal RICO conviction has already occurred, it can simplify matters for civil plaintiffs, as the defendant may be “estopped” from denying the allegations in the civil court.

Defenses and Limitations in RICO Cases

Given the severe penalties and broad scope of RICO, mounting an effective defense is paramount. RICO cases are notoriously complex, often involving vast amounts of evidence, multiple defendants, and intricate legal arguments. However, several constitutional protections and judicial guardrails exist to prevent the overbroad or abusive application of this powerful statute.

Navigating these complexities requires specialized legal knowledge and a deep understanding of federal criminal law. As former prosecutors, we understand how the government builds these cases and, crucially, where their weaknesses lie.

What is the required knowledge and intent for a RICO law violation?

For an individual to be held liable under RICO, the government must prove a specific mental state, or mens rea. It’s not enough to simply be associated with an enterprise that commits crimes; there must be a level of knowledge and intent.

RICO liability extends only to individuals who have some level of knowledge of and intent to engage in or facilitate unlawful activity. For a substantive RICO violation (e.g., conducting the enterprise’s affairs through racketeering), the government must establish that the defendant:

• Knew of the general nature of the enterprise’s activities.
• Willfully participated in the affairs of the enterprise.
• Knew that their actions were part of a pattern of racketeering activity.
• Had the requisite intent for each underlying predicate act they committed or agreed to commit.

For a RICO conspiracy, the intent requirement is slightly different. As per DOJ guidance on proving intent, the government must establish an agreement between individuals to commit the substantive RICO offense. This means proving that the defendant agreed to participate in the enterprise’s affairs with knowledge of the conspiracy’s general scope and that it extended beyond their individual role, and with the intent that others would commit predicate acts. Without this critical element of knowledge and intent, a RICO charge cannot stand.

Constitutional and Judicial Guardrails

While powerful, RICO is not without its checks and balances. The courts, particularly the Supreme Court, have established significant guardrails to protect individual liberties and prevent the law’s overreach:

• First Amendment Protections: The Supreme Court has repeatedly affirmed that “guilt by association is a philosophy alien to the traditions of a free society.” In cases like NAACP v. Clairborne Hardware Co., the Court emphasized that the First Amendment protects against RICO liability based solely on association or protected speech, even in extreme circumstances. This is crucial for activists, protestors, and organizations whose activities might be misconstrued as part of a criminal enterprise.
• Strict Proof of Elements: Courts demand rigorous proof of each RICO element. The “enterprise” must be distinct from the “pattern of racketeering activity.” The “pattern” itself must meet the demanding “continuity plus relationship” test. This prevents prosecutors from simply aggregating disparate criminal acts into a RICO charge without demonstrating a coherent, organized criminal structure.
• Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.: This landmark case saw the Supreme Court reverse a RICO conviction against anti-abortion groups, finding that their actions, while potentially unlawful, did not constitute “extortion” (the predicate act alleged) under the Hobbs Act. This ruling reinforced that predicate acts must fit their legal definitions precisely and cannot be stretched to fit the facts.

These guardrails are vital in ensuring that RICO remains a tool against genuine criminal enterprises and does not become an instrument to suppress legitimate, if unpopular, activities.

How does Texas’s RICO law compare to the federal statute?

While the federal RICO Act is certainly the most well-known, many states, including Texas, have their own versions of anti-racketeering statutes. In Texas, the primary law targeting organized criminal activity is found in Texas Penal Code Chapter 71: Organized Criminal Activity.

Texas’s statute shares the federal law’s core philosophy of targeting groups engaged in a pattern of criminal conduct. However, there are some key differences:

• “Combination” vs. “Enterprise”: Instead of “enterprise,” Texas law refers to a “criminal combination.” While similar in concept, the definition and proof requirements for a “combination” can differ from the federal “enterprise” element.
• Predicate Offenses: Texas’s list of predicate offenses, while comprehensive, is specific to state law. It includes many offenses similar to federal RICO (like murder, robbery, theft, fraud, drug offenses), but there might be nuances or different thresholds. Our internal article, Texas Crimes: Racketeering, provides more detail on how these crimes are approached at the state level.
• Jurisdiction: Federal RICO charges are prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney’s Office (for us, in the Southern District of Texas). State Organized Criminal Activity charges are handled by the local District Attorney’s Office, such as the Harris County District Attorney’s Office.
• Penalties: While both carry severe penalties, the specific sentencing guidelines, fines, and forfeiture procedures will adhere to state law for Texas Organized Criminal Activity charges.

Understanding these distinctions is crucial, especially in Houston, where individuals or groups might face concurrent federal and state investigations or charges for similar conduct. Our firm regularly handles cases in both federal and Harris County courts, giving us a unique perspective on the interplay between these complex statutes.

Frequently Asked Questions about RICO Law in Houston

Can I be charged with RICO if I didn’t personally commit the main crimes?

Yes, absolutely. This is one of the most surprising and powerful aspects of RICO, particularly its conspiracy provision (18 U.S.C. § 1962(d)). You can be charged with RICO conspiracy if you merely agree to facilitate the enterprise’s criminal activities, even if you never personally committed a single predicate act. The key is your agreement to participate in the overall scheme, knowing its general criminal purpose. This broad liability is why even individuals with seemingly minor roles in a larger organization can find themselves facing devastating RICO charges.

Is the RICO Act only used against mobsters and gangs?

No, that’s a common misconception! While RICO was indeed originally designed to combat the Mafia and has been effectively used against traditional organized crime groups and street gangs, its application has expanded dramatically. Today, federal prosecutors in Houston and across the country use RICO against a wide array of enterprises, including:

• Legitimate businesses engaged in a pattern of fraud or other illegal activities.
• Corrupt political organizations or public officials.
• Drug trafficking networks.
• White-collar criminals involved in elaborate financial schemes.
• Even groups involved in human trafficking or other illicit operations.

The law’s flexibility means it can target any group of individuals associated in fact that engages in a pattern of racketeering activity.

What is the difference between a criminal and civil RICO case?

The distinction between criminal and civil RICO cases is significant:

• Criminal RICO: These cases are brought by the government (e.g., the U.S. Attorney’s Office). The standard of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt,” meaning the government must convince a jury that there is no other logical explanation for the facts except that the defendant committed the crime. Penalties include severe prison sentences (up to 20 years per count, or even life), substantial fines, and mandatory forfeiture of assets.
• Civil RICO: These cases are brought by private parties (individuals or businesses) who have been “injured in their business or property” by a RICO violation. The standard of proof is lower, requiring only a “preponderance of the evidence” – meaning it’s more likely than not that the defendant engaged in the racketeering activity. The primary remedy in civil RICO is financial: the plaintiff can recover “treble damages” (triple their actual losses), plus attorney’s fees.

Both types of cases are complex and carry profound consequences, but they serve different purposes and operate under different legal frameworks.

Moving Forward When Facing RICO Allegations

What is RICO law? It is a formidable piece of federal legislation designed to dismantle organized criminal enterprises by targeting their patterns of illegal activity. From its origins combating the Mafia to its modern application against white-collar criminals, corrupt officials, and contemporary gangs, RICO remains a powerful and evolving force in federal criminal law.

The stakes in a RICO case are extraordinarily high, involving severe criminal penalties like decades in prison, massive fines, and asset forfeiture, as well as the potential for crippling civil lawsuits with treble damages. Navigating these complex legal waters requires specialized knowledge, meticulous preparation, and an aggressive defense strategy.

At The Martinez Law Firm, we understand the unique challenges posed by RICO charges. Our lead attorney, Herman Martinez, brings invaluable insights from his years as a former Chief Prosecutor for the Harris County District Attorney’s Office and a City of Houston Judge. This experience on both sides of the courtroom allows us to anticipate prosecutorial strategies and craft robust defenses for our clients facing federal charges in Houston and throughout Texas.

If you or someone you know is facing a RICO investigation or charges, don’t hesitate. The time to build a strong defense is now. Contact a Houston federal criminal defense attorney for a consultation at The Martinez Law Firm. We are here to protect your rights and fight for your future.

About the author